*if Donald Trump were a person of color, would anyone really listen to him? Clearly, he is voicing what the boys at Limby's or Dorey's might say sitting at the bar, but my hunch is that mainstream Americans would probably see him as making racist, unacceptable comments. Trump is obviously Caucasian, wealthy, successful, and outspoken; granted, his comments are not as far off the wall as many would like us to believe, but, because of his pedigree, we seem all too eager to endorse his views. If an Al Sharpton were to say the exact same words, I seriously doubt that we would agree with him. The reason is obvious, isn't it? The underlying "elephant in the room" is racism. I am convinced that much of the opposition to our current President is his skin color, unfortunate as it is for me to write those words. Trump is white, so many hop on his wagon. For too long, I have heard this comment regarding President Obama: "I'm not prejudiced, but . . ."--you fill in the blanks. Seems to me that the "but" carries a powerful undercurrent that disguises many white Americans' not-so-public feelings.
*if the Browns could successfully build a winning franchise if they would just give a head coach and his staff four years to jell. This season will be interesting; in all likelihood, the record will not indicate significant improvement, but I have to believe that a "building" culture must be allowed to materialize. When a city as starved as Cleveland suffers through another long year, the coaches take the criticism. For once, I would love to see the owner turn a deaf ear to fans regardless of the season victory totals and say, "This coach is our man, and we are sticking with him." Yep, Mr. Haslam is saying that today after a few days of training camp, but I hope he is still saying it in December . . . and meaning it.
*if professional sports are in significant need of dramatic changes. Football's injury lists are sad to see, particularly with the catastrophic injuries that occur more frequently every year; basketball is a close second as our own Cavaliers can attest; and baseball's all-too-common arm blowouts are devastating to the sport. Perhaps shorter seasons could be an answer, but I am perplexed by what appears to be a contradictory belief: professional athletes today are stronger than they have ever been and have the best workout regimens, diets, and flexibility training. So, the logical conclusion would be that the percentage of athletes being severely injured would be reduced; however, the opposite has occurred with injury numbers climbing every sports season. Is it possible that the mantra of "lift, lift, lift--get bigger, get stronger" has created a monster, one that exceeds the human body's capabilities particularly when the strong meet the strong?
*if we truly understand the complexity of a policeman/woman's job. Today, of course, an officer's every move is under the proverbial microscope. Granted, as in any profession, rogues exist in uniform; however, we must also understand that much--not all--of a peacekeeper's job is dealing with the "scum"--those who have little if any respect for authority. Certainly, we talk tough after the fact about what should have been done, but given the split-second thinking and reacting that those officers must perform is something few of us could do. I also must stress that to perform these duties, the financial reward is almost embarrassing. Translated, we ask "cops" (as the term most frequently used) to not make a mistake, to not embarrass people, and to not profile anyone--and I am not just talking about race when I mention profiling. Additionally, we ask them to do this while not making as much money as a bulldozer operator. Something seems out of whack, doesn't it?
*if Dover's citizens realize that we just lost an excellent superintendent, but we have the great fortune of having a successor who is equally qualified. I have said it many times, but a person in charge is living in "rare air"--the friends become fewer, the opponents become larger, and the criticism becomes more frequent. Such is the case when a person is a school administrator whose salary and benefits are public knowledge because that information immediately creates opposition. It intrigues me when criticism is leveled at school administrators; their task is to maintain the ship and do what is right for all parties involved: students, employees, and taxpayers. If a person were to examine Dover's record, that person would see excellence in many areas, including financial responsibility. Of course, many will not believe me--check the records, my friends: those are facts, not opinions. The future of the system is in strong hands with responsible leadership in both the top job and the assistant superintendent. Will the issue of a new school again surface? Of course! It was not a Bob Hamm thing; it's a Dover thing. . . and I don't want to wait until the crumbling begins to say, "Hey, we should have done something before this like to maintain the building" (as I have heard many times). Check the facts, my friends--before we spout off about how "a custodian told me that they haven't done anything . . . ," it might be a good idea to actually find out just how much has been spent on that high school building. Again, before we settle on our opinions, let's make sure we know the facts.
*if the Common Core opponents are pleased that the accompanying tests have been temporarily abandoned. I would think they are because the teachers certainly are! As I have written previously, the excessive number of tests was a central issue; if the Core is studied, don't be surprised if we find out that it has a strong base. Again, from my seat, the Core is not a problem; we need standards, and we need them enforced. Remember my comment two paragraphs above about rogues? In the teaching profession, unfortunately, random rogues can be found as well. By having standards that are consistent, teachers are obligated to teach certain material, but they are not stuck teaching only that material--teachers still have the freedom to go beyond the Core! For those who are opposed to the Core and know only a limited bit about it, please recognize that, educationally, it holds strong value. As stated in an earlier blog, just give it time to be implemented and perfected--change does not come about without opposition, but it does not mean that change is necessarily wrong.
*if you are still reading. You must be, so thanks! Many have commented that they have enjoyed reading my material--I do appreciate it. At my "core," I am just a T-County boy who enjoys life and enjoys writing--thanks again for your support!
mag.gunther@gmail.com
michaelagunther.blogspot.com
Very accurate and appropriate comment.
ReplyDelete